General discussion ("high" traffic): trinity-users
To send a message to the list, send it to trinity-users@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
To subscribe, send an empty Email to trinity-users-subscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
To unsubscribe, send an empty Email to trinity-users-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net

Trinity project announcements (low traffic): trinity-announce
To subscribe, send an empty Email to trinity-announce-subscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
To unsubscribe, send an empty Email to trinity-announce-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Web Archive: http://trinity-announce.pearsoncomputing.net

Trinity developers list (moderate traffic): trinity-devel
To send a message to the list, send it to trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
To subscribe, send an empty Email to trinity-devel-subscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
To unsubscribe, send an empty Email to trinity-devel-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net

Trinity automated commit notification list ("high" traffic): trinity-commits
To subscribe, send an empty Email to trinity-commits-subscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
To unsubscribe, send an empty Email to trinity-commits-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Web archive: http://trinity-commits.pearsoncomputing.net

When you reply to a message on these lists, please avoid top-posting as in this example:

    
        HAL has been deprecated in newer kernel releases, so 
        it should be deprecated in Trinity as well.

        Tim

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Curious [mailto:curious@example.com]
        Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2010 2:54 AM
        To: Tim
        Cc: trinity-devel@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
        Subject: Re: HAL usage

        Should HAL be used in upcoming Trinity releases instead 
        of the newer udev/upower interface?

        This might be easier than a full rewrite of HAL-dependent 
        code.

        Sincerely,

        I. M. Curious
    

Instead, please add your reply to the bottom of the original thread, or interleave your response with snippets of the original message.

This is an example of why top posting is considered impolite (as seen on linux-kernel):

    
        A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally 
            read text.
        Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
        A: Top-posting.
        Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?